Jimmy Carter: Failure Of Catholic Church To Ordain Women Is A Human Rights Abuse

It’s not news when irrelevant people spout irrational opinions, because it happens nearly all the time, but hey – it’s been a slow day.

From Swampland:

Let’s get right to it. This week the Carter Center’s Mobilizing Faith for Women conference will ask the question, “Can religion be a force for women’s rights instead of a source of women’s oppression?” What’s your answer?

Well, religion can be, and I think there’s a slow, very slow, move around the world to give women equal rights in the eyes of God. What has been the case for many centuries is that the great religions, the major religions, have discriminated against women in a very abusive fashion and set an example for the rest of society to treat women as secondary citizens. In a marriage or in the workplace or wherever, they are discriminated against. And I think the great religions have set the example for that, by ordaining, in effect, that women are not equal to men in the eyes of God.

This has been done and still is done by the Catholic Church ever since the third century, when the Catholic Church ordained that a woman cannot be a priest for instance but a man can. A woman can be a nurse or a teacher but she can’t be a priest. This is wrong, I think. As you may or may not know, the Southern Baptist Convention back now about 13 years ago in Orlando, voted that women were inferior and had to be subservient to their husbands, and ordained that a woman could not be a deacon or a pastor or a chaplain or even a teacher in a classroom in some seminaries where men are in the classroom, boys are in the classroom. So my wife and I withdrew from the Southern Baptist Convention primarily because of that…

In the Islamic world that varies widely depending on what the regime is in the capital. Sometimes they try to impose very strict law, misquoting I think the major points of the Qur’an, and they ordain that a woman is inferior inherently. Ten year old girls can be forced to marry against their wishes, and that women can be treated as slaves in a marriage, and that a woman can’t drive an automobile, some countries don’t let women vote, like Saudi Arabia.

Yeah, the Catholic Church is just like the Islam religion in how women are treated. Practically indistinguishable.  And in case he was unclear, later in the interview, Jimmy mentions the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

How can mobilizing religious communities for women’s rights produce results?

To repeat myself in a way, I think that what the major religious leaders say is used by others who discriminate against women as justification for their human rights abuse. For instance if an employer, who might be otherwise enlightened, if he is a religious person and he sees that, he might be a Catholic, and a Catholic does not let women be priests, then why should he pay his women employees an equal pay [as men]?

In the United States that prevails all over. We have an average now of about 70% that a woman earns compared to a 100% that a man earns for doing the same job. And very few of the corporate boards have I think 50% women. Very few of them. And of course we have a very few percentage of women in our House of Representatives and in our Senate. We never yet had a woman president, but I think that’s going to come in the near future. But I think in general terms this is a very derogating thing.

It is much worse in some of the third world countries where genital cutting is condoned and girls are forced to marry when they are as young as 8 or 10 years old and they have no voice in who their husband might be or when they get married. And you see the extreme case with Al Qaeda and particularly with the Taliban in Afghanistan. So these are the kind of things that permeate society in a very general way and it afflicts almost every single community in America and almost throughout the world. There is a sense that women are not quite equal to men both politically and economically and in religious terms.

I love Jimmy’s logic here: since the Church doesn’t ordain women, then Catholic employers will feel it’s okay to pay female employees less. Never mind that Catholic priests earn less than anybody else in the Church – that makes too much sense. Then again, Jimmy rarely made sense anyway.

I suppose I should give him credit for acknowledging that genital cutting is worse than the Catholic Church not ordaining women. Of course genital cutting is worse, but in his mind – and in the minds of so many people who think like him – it’s only worse in degree, but not in kind.

Hey Jimmy! How come it’s bad to refuse women their “choice” to be a womynpreest, but it’s great to give them the choice to abort their unborn daughters?  ‘Splain that justice for me!

About Larry D

LarryD has been blogging since March 2008, making observations on trends within the culture and the Church. His goal? Poking hornets nests with a stick and injecting humor into the New Evangelization, with the gentle reminder that everyone's taking themselves way too seriously. He currently resides in Michigan.
This entry was posted in Abortion, Blah Blah Blah, Idiots On Display, Womynpreests. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Jimmy Carter: Failure Of Catholic Church To Ordain Women Is A Human Rights Abuse

  1. Robbins Mitchell says:

    Well,see?…this isn’t the first time Jimmah has gone “full apostate”….personally I’m what could be termed a “fundamentalist evangelical”…Church of Christ…”no creed but the Bible”….and my position is that if there is no direct scriptural authority for something,it doesn’t belong in the worship service or the canons of Church doctrine…..how anyone can argue that to be ordained as a clergyman in ANY branch of the Christian faith is somehow a “human right” staggers the imagination…..Jimmah needs a series of remedial Sunday School classes or something…before he further embarrasses himself

  2. AA Cunningham says:

    Not only is the peanut farmer and failed president a mushhead when it comes to the subject of ordaining(sic) women, he still doesn’t know squat about economics either.


  3. Jean says:

    Mr. Carter may have left the Southern Baptist Church, but he still has the prejudice against the Mackeral-snapping Papists, doesn’t he? What’s this stuff about the Catholic Church “ordaining” that women were inferior in the 3rd century? Were there priestesses running around before that?

    If so, someone should do an homage to the Jack Chick booklets. Show an evil bishop (but that’s redundant) smoking a cigar and eating bonbons while women scrub floors in a gigantic rectory and making unleavened bread in a Death Cookie factory. The bishop (dressed like the Pope because Jack Chick booklets, like honeybadger, don’t care) will tell a naive seminary student (male, of course, and wearing a suit and tie) that this is all a Papist plot dating to the 3rd century when the Whore of Babylon ordained women were inferior and must wear heels and NEVER pants. In the last panel, the bishop will grin really wide and say, “And they think they’re working for God, but really they’re working for Satan and his minimum wage: death! Bwahaha!”

    Gosh, a horrible thought just occurred to me: What if the eminent novelist Dan Brown reads the beloved former President’s remarks and writes a novel called “The Joan Logarithm” about a certain Sister Joan who’s really the descendent of the eighth-cousin twice-removed from St. Joan, famously burned for her feminist ideology?

  4. Tunces says:

    I was going to say – but he’s Southern Baptist. By the same token, I’m surprised he hasn’t said mandatory celibacy is a human rights abuse as well. He may have dementia, which could explain why he missed that one.

  5. It never ceases to amaze me about the grace of God. He allows people such as Carter to exist into their old age perchance there might be more opportunity of genuine Christian repentance. The Lord is patient and gracious; yet, Carter still has not caught on…….

  6. Pingback: Jimmy Carter Accuses Catholic Church of Human Rights Abuse for Not Ordaining Women | L.I.I.S. ONLINE

  7. Cocoa says:

    He musta stumbled on an old case of Billy Beer.

  8. Robert Devi says:

    Jean said “Were there priestesses running around before that?”

    Actually there were and they were extremely common. Priestesses of Ishtar, Kali, and Pythia were three such examples.

    But despite this (or actually because of this), women were treated as property in those cultures.

    In contrast, a disproportiate number of the early Catholic converts were women precisely because Catholicism gave women a dignity that they did not have in surrounding cultures, and it still does. Whereas modern culture tells women that are only truly women if they become men (disavow their feminity and motherhood) or become prostitutes (objects of lust for men), Catholicism dares to affirm true non-objectified femininity and dares to assert that outside of Jesus, the highest of all humans is a woman.

  9. Pingback: Jimmy Carter: Failure Of Catholic Church To Ordain Women Is A Human Rights Abuse | The American Catholic

  10. BeePee says:

    If any man is denied the ‘right’ to become a priest is that a human rights abuse as well?

  11. Brad Jones says:

    Mr (president?) Carter seems to have not read history. Only two groups of heretics attempted to ordain women. One of them claimed women were needed to image Mary as her priestess. The other group claimed women were not saved because they were less then men and ordained them to make them “male”. Amazing that only those who actually believed what Protestants accuse the Catholic church of were the ones to ordain women.

  12. Father Joe says:

    My thoughts, for what they are worth, on this matter. Too many words for a comment box:

Comments are closed.